Rate opacity, inconsistent assignments, zero transparency. Here's what's driving experienced OTRs away from traditional agencies — and what to do instead.
For the past decade, agency work has been the default path for licensed occupational therapists who wanted flexibility, variety, or geographic mobility. That's changing fast. Experienced OTRs are leaving agencies in growing numbers — and the reasons they cite are strikingly consistent.
Ask an agency OT what the facility actually pays for their hours and you'll rarely get a straight answer. Most contracts bundle the therapist's rate into a larger "vendor rate" the agency negotiates with the facility — and the margin between what the facility pays and what the therapist receives is not disclosed.
For a standard SNF assignment, facilities typically pay agencies $85–$120 per hour for an OT. The therapist sees $55–$75. The 30–50% margin goes to the agency. That's not inherently wrong — agencies provide recruiting, compliance, and cash-flow services — but the opacity is what frustrates clinicians. Most therapists have no way to know what their work is actually billed at.
Agency assignments are often distributed opaquely. A recruiter calls with a match, and the OT gets minimal information: location, hours, rate, maybe the setting. They rarely get to see the caseload size, the productivity expectation, the documentation system, or honest context about why the position is open.
Experienced therapists have learned to ask the right questions, but new grads frequently accept assignments that turn out to be burnout factories — 90% productivity demands in a building with a toxic culture, or a caseload so complex no single clinician can manage it well.
Every new facility an agency places you in typically requires a fresh round of compliance: new background check, new drug screen, new TB test, new HIPAA module, new facility-specific orientation. The agency doesn't transfer credentials between facilities — each one starts from scratch.
For a therapist picking up PRN work at three different SNFs, that's three separate compliance packets, often three sets of test kits, and weeks of delay before their first billable hour. Credential-once models that transfer across an entire platform have become a major draw.
The alternatives falling into place have a few things in common:
This isn't a clean story of platforms winning and agencies losing. Some platforms have swung too far the other way — pushing too much compliance and administrative burden onto the therapist with no support — and therapists have burned out on them too.
The sustainable model appears to be hybrid: platform handles verification, compliance, payments, and match distribution transparently; therapist retains control over schedule, rate setting (for private clients), and which assignments they accept.
If you're considering leaving an agency, a few practical notes:
The agency model isn't dead, and it still works well for some career stages — new grads needing supervised orientation, therapists who want zero administrative lift, or clinicians relocating who need someone else to handle the credentialing dance. But for the mid-career OT who wants autonomy, transparency, and a meaningful voice in their own practice, the alternatives are finally good enough to make the switch.
Join AzenCare's network of licensed OT, PT, and SLP professionals. Transparent pay, weekly payouts, in-person and telehealth.
Navigating the therapy search as a parent or caregiver is overwhelming — especially when you're also trying to figure ou...
AzenCare is launching telehealth OT soon. Here's what the evidence says about virtual occupational therapy for children,...
From finding the right SNF OT to managing telehealth PT for a parent at home — a practical guide for caregivers navigati...